Les enfants sont hospitalisés et même aux soins intensifs avec COVID, même si très peu en meurent.
Les chiffres si haut que j'ai mis sont les hospitalisation et c'est très très peu (beaucoup beaucoup que disons le grippe mais ce n'est pas quelque chose de legé pour un jeune enfant non plus).
J'ai très peu porter le masque, mais quand j'en porte un bon un certain temps au costco ou autre, j'ai beaucoup de compassion pour ceux qui le porte, pour ceux qui le porte dans le context de parler pour le travail encore plus.
Ils sont également d'excellentes courroies de transmission.
Ça ne semble pas très claire la littérature sur le sujet ( et même qu'elle pointerais vers le contraire):
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-briefs/transmission_k_12_schools.html#sars-cov-2https://www.health.harvard.edu/diseases-and-conditions/coronavirus-outbreak-and-kidsMost children who become infected with the COVID-19 virus have no symptoms, or they have milder symptoms such as low-grade fever, fatigue, and cough. Early studies suggested that children do not contribute much to the spread of coronavirus. But more recent studies raise concerns that children could be capable of spreading the infection.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-01826-xOne of the largest studies1 on COVID-19 in schools in the United States looked at more than 90,000 pupils and teachers in North Carolina over 9 weeks last autumn. Given the rate of transmission in the community, “we would have expected to see about 900 cases” in the schools, says Daniel Benjamin, a paediatrician at Duke Clinical Research Institute in Durham, North Carolina, and co-lead author on the study. But when the researchers conducted contact tracing to identify school-related transmissions, they identified only 32 cases (see ‘Meagre spread’).
Another study2 looked at 17 schools in rural Wisconsin. The research team observed 191 COVID-19 cases in staff and students during 13 weeks in the autumn of 2020, a time of high transmission for that area. Only seven of those cases seemed to originate in the schools. A second study, not yet published, looked at Nebraska. “They were open the whole year with over 20,000 students and staff, and there were only 2 transmission events during that entire study period,” Høeg says.
Studies that have included testing tend to show similarly low transmission rates. Researchers in Norway3 identified 13 confirmed cases in children aged 5–13 in schools, and tested nearly 300 of their close contacts to assess the secondary attack rate — the percentage of contacts who become infected from a single case. Just 0.9% of the child contacts and 1.7% of the adult contacts contracted the virus.
In Salt Lake City4, researchers went one step further. They offered COVID-19 tests to more than 1,000 students and staff who had come into contact with any of 51 pupils who had tested positive. Of the roughly 700 people who took the tests, just 12 tested positive. The scientists then used contact tracing and genetic sequencing to identify transmissions that occurred at school. Only 5 of the 12 were school-related — an attack rate of just 0.7%.
The bulk of the literature on transmission in schools, however, suggests that kids aren’t driving viral spread. Investigations in Germany, France, Ireland, Australia, Singapore and the United States show no, or very low, secondary attack rates within school settings.Il semblerais que les écoles soit un des pires couroit de transmissions, que les jeunes serait très peu virulant (ou très résistant a l'attrapé ou un mélange des 2) et ça c'était avant que les parents soit vaccinés comme aujourd'hui, peut-être que le maire de New-York avait raison et que les écoles aurait du rester ouverte pour les élèves sans conditions spéciales dès que l'équipement pour protéger le staff soit suffisant.
Cependant:
When mitigation measures aren’t in place, however, attack rates can be much higher. In Israel6, schools reopened in mid-May 2020. Within two weeks, a large outbreak occurred in one secondary school. Administrators tested more than 1,200 close contacts of the two people who initially tested positive. They identified 153 infected students and 25 infected staff members — attack rates of 13.2% and 16.6%
I.e. tous les chiffres de 2020 était quand les gens faisait très attention ce serait peut-être bien différent dans un environnement relaxé que l'on veut ravoir le plus vite possible.